Roman Triumph
In addition to being a must-read for anyone interested in military victories (she ties the Roman celebration to modern events), Roman Triumph should be on the short list for those concerned with historical accuracy or the ancient historians. Beard explains why we have certain stereotypes about Roman triumphs, but she also shows how those stereotypes may have been one-time occurrences, deductions based on faulty information, guesses or lies. Importantly, most of what she writes about Roman triumphs applies to ancient history, in general.
After warning the reader to be skeptical of accounts based on hearsay generations after the events, Beard stresses that there is a limit to how skeptical we should be. Triumphs like Pompey's in 61 B.C. are documented so many places, including public inscriptions, that it would be perverse to deny it, but it would be equally perverse to accept the triumph of Romulus as any more historical than the stories of King Arthur.
Beard wrote Roman Triumph for a general audience. I'm not sure what makes something suitable for the general audience and what makes it only for a select few. I know her blog is entertaining and accessible. Likewise, the prose of Roman Triumph is witty and easy enough to read, but I still wouldn't recommend it for people who know little about ancient history.
Mary Beard writes the irreverent "A Don's Life," a blog, from her perspective as a Cambridge University don.



Comments
No comments yet. Leave a Comment