Ancient Civs Along Fault Lines
Saturday August 23, 2008
One of the pitfalls of ancient history is assuming everything was the same way back when. It's difficult to be aware of all the areas where there has been change, but shorelines, climate, and trees are physical areas to look for change. Although mountains do gradually change, they are relatively stable -- except for volcanoes. A similarly stable element is tectonic plates, although the reason they were identified is precisely because they have moved. Nonetheless, it seems safe to this non-geologist to assume geologists know what they're saying when they say 13/15 ancient civilizations formed along fault lines.
In Did Rumbling Give Rise to Rome? (By David Malakoff ScienceNOW Daily News 22 August 2008), Eric Force, a geologist, has theorized that psychological reasons may have been in play, as well as the rich soil and nearness of water. Of the 15 civilizations, the two that were not within 75 km of the plates in Europe and Asia, Egypt and China, lasted longer than the others.


Comments
tectonic plate edges => volcanoes
volcanoes => rich biodiversity, rich agriculture
Seems like a logical place to find/invent agriculture and start a civ, except for the earthquakes and eruptions!
It is interesting that the geologist is looking for psychological rationale.
The location along a fault line can give rise to powerful stories like the snatching of Persephone by Hades.