Democracy Then and Now |
IntroductionThe world was stunned when Bush was first named winner, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials on the basis of majority rule? Well, part of the answer is that the U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage -- and I'm not talking about voters disenfranchised by improper balloting and tallying. In ancient Athens, the birthplace of democracy, not only were children denied the vote, but so were women, foreigners, and slaves. People of power or influence weren't concerned with the rights of such non-citizens. What mattered was whether or not the unusual system was any good. Was it working for itself or for the community? Would it be better to have an intelligent, virtuous, benevolent ruling class or a society dominated by a mob seeking material comfort for itself? In contrast with the law-based democracy of the Athenians, monarchy/tyranny (rule by one) and aristocracy/oligarchy (rule by the few) were practiced by neighboring Hellenes and Persians. All eyes turned to the Athenian experiment, and few liked what they saw. On the following pages you'll find passages on democracy from some of the philosophers, orators, and historians of the time, many neutral to unfavorable. Then as now, whoever benefits from a given system tends to support it. One of the most positive positions Thucydides puts into the mouth of a leading beneficiary of the system, Pericles. |
More of Democracy Then and Now |
| Part 1: Introduction Part 2: Aristotle Part 3: Thucydides Part 4: Plato Part 5: Aeschines Part 6: Isocrates Part 7: Herodotus Part 8: Pseudo-Xenophon |
| ~ N.S. Gill |

