Ancient Historians on India | Ancient Sources on Ancient India
Late Date for Written Sources for Indian History
"It is common knowledge that there is no corresponding equivalent on the Indian side. Ancient India has no historiography in the European sense of the word-in this respect the only ' historiographic civilizations ' of the world are the Graeco-Roman and Chinese ones...."
"Rome and India: Aspects of Universal History during the Principate," by Walter Schmitthenner; The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 69 (1979), pp. 90-106.
Some (used to) say that the history of India and the Indian Subcontinent didn't begin until the Muslims invaded in the 12th century A.D. While thorough history-writing may stem from such a late date, there are earlier historical writers with 1st-hand knowledge. Unfortunately, they don't extend back in time as far as we might like or as far as in other ancient cultures.
When writing about a group of people who died thousands of years ago, as in ancient history, there are always gaps and guesses. History tends to be written by the victors and about the powerful. When history is not even written, as was the case in early ancient India, there are still ways to extract information -- mostly archaeological, but also "obscure literary texts, inscriptions in forgotten languages, and stray foreign notices," but it doesn't lend itself to "straightline political history, the history of heroes and empires" [Narayanan].
"Although thousands of seals and inscribed artifacts have been recovered, the Indus script remains undeciphered. Unlike Egypt or Mesopotamia, this remains a civilization inaccessible to historians.... In the Indus case, while the descendents of urban dwellers and technological practices did not entirely disappear, the cities their ancestors had inhabited did. Indus script and the information it recorded also were no longer remembered."
Thomas R. Trautmann and Carla M. Sinopoli
When Darius and Alexander (327 B.C.) invaded India, they provided dates around which the history of India is constructed. India did not have its own western-style historian before these incursions, and so reasonably reliable chronology of India dates from Alexander's invasion in the late 4th century B.C.
Shifting Geographic Limits of India
India originally referred to the area of the Indus River valley, which was a province of the Persian Empire. That's how Herodotus refers to it. Later, the term India included the area bounded on the north by the Himalayas and Karakoram mountain ranges, the penetrable Hindu Kush in the northwest, and on the northeast, the hills of Assam and Cachar. The Hindu Kush soon became the border between the Mauryan empire and that of the Seleucid successor of Alexander the Great. Seleucid-controlled Bactria sat immediately to the north of the Hindu Kush. Then Bactria separated from the Seleucids, and independently invaded india.
The Indus River provided a natural, but controversial border between India and Persia. It is said that Alexander conquered India, but Edward James Rapson of The Cambridge History of India Volume I: Ancient India says it's only true if you mean the original sense of India -- the country of the Indus Valley -- since Alexander didn't go beyond the Beas (Hyphasis). [See King Porus.]
Nearchus - Eyewitness Source on Indian History
Alexander's admiral Nearchus wrote about the Macedonian fleet's travel from the Indus River to the Persian Gulf. Arrian (c. A.D. 87 - after 145) later used Nearchus' works in his own writings on India. This has preserved some of Nearchus' now lost material.
Arrian's report says that Alexander was told by inhabitants of Gedrosia (Baluchistan) about others who had used that same travel route. The legendary Semiramis, they said, had fled through that route from India with only 20 members of her army and Cambyses' son Cyrus returned with only 7 [Rapson].
Megasthenes - Eyewitness Source on Indian History
Megasthenes, who stayed in India from 317 to 312 B.C. and served as ambassador of Seleucus I at the court of Chandragupta Maurya (referred to in the Greek as Sandrokottos), is another Greek source on India. He is quoted in Arrian and Strabo, where the Indians denied having engaged in foreign warfare with any but Hercules, Dionysus and the Macedonians (Alexander). Of the westerners who might have invaded India, Megasthenes says Semiramis died before invading and the Persians acquired mercenary troops from India [Rapson]. Whether or not Cyrus invaded northern India depends on where the border is or was set; however, Darius seems to have gone as far as the Indus.
Native Indian Sources on Indian History
Soon after the Macedonians, the Indians themselves produced artifacts that help us with the history. Particularly important are the stone pillars of the Mauryan king Ahsoka (c. 272- 235 B.C.) which provide the first glimpse of an authentic historical Indian figure.
Another Indian source on the Mauryan dynasty is the Arthashastra of Kautilya. Although the author is sometimes identified as Chandragupta Maurya's minister Chanakya, Sinopoli and Traupmann say the Arthashastra was probably written in the second century A.D.
- "The Hour-Glass of India"
C. H. Buck
The Geographical Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Mar., 1915), pp. 233-237
- Historical Perspectives on Ancient India
M. G. S. Narayanan
Social Scientist, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Oct., 1975), pp. 3-11
- "Alexander and India"
A. K. Narain
Greece & Rome, Second Series, Vol. 12, No. 2, Alexander the Great (Oct., 1965), pp. 155-165
- The Cambridge History of India Volume I: Ancient India
By Edward James Rapson
Copyright 1922 The Macmillan Company
- "In the Beginning Was the Word: Excavating the Relations between History and Archaeology in South Asia"
Thomas R. Trautmann and Carla M. Sinopoli
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 45, No. 4, Excavating the Relations between Archaeology and History in the Study of Pre-Modern Asia [Part 1] (2002), pp. 492-523
- "Two Notes on Seleucid History: 1. Seleucus' 500 Elephants, 2. Tarmita"
W. W. Tarn
The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 60 (1940), pp. 84-94