The Bottom Line
Pros
- Concise
- Up-to-date
Cons
- Not about ancient history
Description
- Shows how to document journals, books, and online media.
- Describes how to evaluate historical sources.
- Clarifies the distinctions among types of sources.
- Explains plagiarism and has a nice section describing when to quote.
- Contains basic paper-writing information.
- Contains ideas on how to approach research topics.
Guide Review - A Pocket Guide to Writing in History
Rampolla covers the essentials of paper writing in general, but with a view to the needs of history. If you are writing about an ancient group you should not apply modern values, you should be aware of your biases, and you should remember that not all members of the group were alike. When you start your paper, you should avoid broad generalizations that can't be proven, like "From the beginning of time...." Rampolla's section on researching the paper provides some references to tools that may help with historical papers, but the information is applicable to other academic disciplines, as well.
Where Rampolla's work really shines is in addressing issues of plagiarism and how to document sources in the age of the Internet, where copying and pasting is too easy and where earlier bibliographical forms were inadequate.
My only objection to Writing in History is that when writing about ancient as opposed to medieval or modern history, there are few written primary sources to use, so Rampolla's advice that you should never base your history paper on secondary sources alone seems idealistic. But then the book was not meant to discuss the special problems of dealing with ancient history, and for the truly conscientious, there generally are other, albeit archaeological or art historical, sources students could examine to supplement the secondary sources.



