Who Was Constantine?:
Constantine is considered the most important of the later Roman emperors because:
- Constantine was the 1st Roman emperor to support Christianity and to become Christian. From the time of Constantine Christianity became the Roman religion with a temporary setback when his nephew Julian tried to reinstate paganism.
- He proclaimed the Edict of Milan in 313 granting religious freedom to all.
- He was victorious against Emperor Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge, which was significant for its Christian symbolism.
- Constantine created a new central, Christian city for the Roman Empire at Byzantium (Constantinople [later, Istanbul]).
Occupation:
Family and Birth of Constantine:
Flavia Julia Constantia was Constantine's half sister.
Constantine married twice. By the 1st he had a son Crispus. By the 2nd, Constantine II, Constans, and Constantius II.
In Hoc Signo Vinces:
Constantine on Heresy:
It was from 325 that Constantine enjoyed sole reign in the Roman empire, having defeated and executed his co-emperor Licinius, who had reneged on the Edict of Milan.
Death of Constantine:
Most people consider Constantine a Christian from the Milvian Bridge in 312, but he wasn't baptized until a quarter century later. Today, Constantine wouldn't count as a Christian without the baptism, but it's not so clear in the first few centuries of Christianity, when Christian dogma had yet to be fixed. Was the deathbed conversion of Constantine the act of a moral pragmatist?
"Constantine was enough of a Christian to wait until his deathbed to be baptized. He knew that a ruler had to do things that were against Christian teachings, so he waited until he no longer had to do such things. That may be the thing that I most respect him for."or a duplicitous hypocrite?
Kirk Johnson
"If I believe in the Christian god, but know that I will have to do things which are against the teachings of that faith, I can be excused for doing so by postponing baptism? Yes, I'll join Alcoholics Anonymous after this crate of beer. If that isn't duplicity and subscription to double standards, then nothing is."
ROBINPFEIFER
See: "Religion and Politics at the Council at Nicaea," by Robert M. Grant. The Journal of Religion, Vol. 55, No. 1 (Jan., 1975), pp. 1-12


