| You are here: | About>Education>Ancient / Classical History> Studying Ancient History> Books on Ancient History> Book Reviews> Seneca's Oedipus - Review of Seneca's Oedipus |
![]() | Ancient / Classical History |
Seneca's OedipusMichael Rutenberg's Translation
I feel at this very moment, Oedipus of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, freely translated by Michael Rutenberg, makes Nero's advisor, the Stoic philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca, and his drama about the unlucky king who killed his father and married his mother, accessible to modern audiences. The first quarter of the slim volume is devoted to locating Seneca in the history of philosophy and the genre of tragedy. The rest, a modern translation, with photographs from a production based on Rutenberg's adaptation, strips the ancient play of its arcane references to show the ancient legend's relevance for today. Rutenberg stresses that Seneca follows both Aristotle's and Horace's dicta on tragic style. The five-act play has unity of action, time and place. A chorus separates each act. Since tragedy was out of vogue in Rome in Seneca's time, it is thought the play was performed privately for a court audience. For such a small production, taking the liberty of making the chorus a single actor makes sense, although this is an innovation of Rutenberg's. Going further, Rutenberg replaces abstruse references to mythology in the chorus' speeches with information on Stoic philosophy from Seneca's dialogues. While Plato would seem to be in the camp of those advocates of television ratings and banning violence from the screen, Aristotle believed on-stage violence is cathartic. In this, too, Seneca follows Aristotle by giving free reign to the bloody acts of mutilation and sacrifice. Rutenberg prefers to hold the sacrifices offstage. He says: Rome's penchant for bloody stage events does nothing to further the action.But that doesn't keep Rutenberg's drama from being gruesomely explicit: [Chorus] Comparing the tragedies of Seneca and Sophocles, Rutenberg points out two major differences. For Seneca, fate is inexorable and man is helpless against destiny: [Chorus] while for Sophocles, tragedy is the result of a tragic flaw. This leads to the second difference. While both heroes suffer from hubris, Seneca's hero is guilt-ridden and open from the beginning to the notion that he may be implicated in the great Theban plague; whereas Sophocles' Oedipus is proud and imperious, practically having to be hit over the head with the truth before he'll admit his involvement. For catharsis, the audience must experience pity and fear. Sophocles accomplishes this with a suspenseful plot, but Seneca goes one better, by adding mood: It is Seneca's unique ability to create a pervasive and claustrophobic mood hovering over his characters like a blanket of thick smoke, choking them and us with the pain of recognition -- much like nuclear fallout after an exploded atom bomb, unstoppable devastation on its way, a modern god of vengeance visiting us on the wind -- that gives his plays such modern relevance. Photos and text suggest ways to modernize or even futurize the drama while preserving the immortal message. Oedipus, whose feet were permanently swollen by an iron bar punched through them when he was an infant, wears orthopedic shoes. The 1999 Hunter College/Michael Rutenberg production was staged in an underground bunker with decontamination chamber. Laser weapons replaced swords. Rutenberg also provides stage directions for those interested in presenting the drama in the manner of wall paintings from 1st century A.D. Pompeii that may represent Senecan costume and drama. For information on buying Oedipus of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, contact Michael Rutenberg's publisher, Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers. |
|
All Topics | Email Article | | | ![]() |
| Advertising Info | News & Events | Work at About | SiteMap | Reprints | Help | Our Story | Be a Guide |
| User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy | ©2008 About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. |


