The Bottom Line
- Mostly written for lay-readers
- Includes timeline and glossary
- Contains exciting vignettes
- The main argument is hard to follow
- Number of words and importance of topic don't seem clearly related
- Develops threads on the Huns and Germans.
- Explains the training of a late imperial aristocrat, Symmachus.
- Covers the impact of the barbarians on Rome.
- Material on Aetius was brilliant, but hard to follow, since it was in different chapters.
- Nice summary concluding chapter.
Guide Review - The Fall of the Roman Empire, by Peter Heather
Heather makes points that need to be taken as Roman history mantras. Among these are that the Roman Empire endured for a very long time, and even if Gibbon's 476 date is taken as the end, rather than the fall of Constantinople or the rise of Islam, the Roman Empire lasted half a millennium, and that no serious historian should believe that the western Empire of Rome fell entirely because of internal problems, or exogenous shock (p.445).
Heather's thesis is that the various assaults on Rome had ripple effects. Rome lost territory and revenue, was spread too thin militarily, and the barbarians on the border kept growing stronger. One attack was not enough, but the cumulative effect caused the fall of the western empire.
Read The Fall of the Roman Empire to get the details.